Theory of universal evolution - a concept

classical physics and quantum physics are the two extreme ends of physics.If we consider physics as a straight line,we can mark classical physics extending to positive infinity and quantum physics to negative infinity.But yet we are unable to define both by a single law,by a single unique theory.Some how Einstein tried to alloy them,but uncertainties borne out.

My idealism is to create a Theory of universal evolution.As i had mentioned the both classical and quantum physics with a straight-line,i had one more intention.For both positive and negative infinity,there is a relation,ZERO.Both are mathematically equidistant,if we add or subtract there is no change.So zero must be a link between them.Similarly,there will be a theory of zero for this two roots of physics.

As i had told my intention by the straight-line,i forgot to tell a thing.Think a case when zero comes greater than infinity?(it may-not be by magnitude but by any concept) then try the arithmetic zero minus positive infinity gives negative infinity and zero minus negative infinity gives positive infinity.See,now we had got a link between them.

Now?

That would be the axis of The theory of universal evolution by which,the concept of zero will be defined and thus we would be able to define the boundary of our dimension and evaluate its existence and hence define what is INFINITY..

What is the relation between Zero and Infinity

We all say we don't know what is infinity.We avoid or neglect infinity.But let me ask,what will you do when infinity will be a task to save our beings?
Let us consider a fact: the end of our universe,we don't know it,so we call it infinity.Ten let us consider the division of subatomic particles,we can't say it had stopped,as every such objections had always broken out.

So what will be this so called infinity,according to my previous posts,i had addressed infinity as the boundary of our dimension.

Yes,i truly agree with that because,our brain and mind and ourselves is trapped in a world of 3 dimensions.Like Carl Sagan,the great scientist said,a creature of its dimension cannot observe the object of an another dimension.Similarly,here our brain and system lacks the sense of imagining what is infinity.Other wise we would be able to exactly define what is infinity.

When we come across infinity,we also must understand what is zero.Zero has been the symbol of nothing or nilness.So my fellows you must be known about the thing nilness,the availability of nothing.When we talk about infinity,we must know about zero because zero is the balancing point of infinity.If there wasn't zero,we can say there won't be anything named infinity.
It is because,we all know there will be some thing to balance an another thing in the universe,unless it is the same

object,the thought about zero in our mind is the same thing which makes our brain confusing about infinity.Which means until we wins to define what is zero,we can't define what is infinity.

So my conclusion is that Infinity and zero are the extreme ends which balances our universe mathematically,this statement will be true till we prove that the both are the same thing.

Are we a part of infinity?

Yes of course,in my view.
We often say infinity doesn't have an end.That may be correct. but from where do we start infinity?we often say infinity for any process that is continuously happening,uncontrollably.

Then let me say some examples,don't be confused,solve this twist:

"I am drawing a picture of mine drawing my picture,and in that i am drawing my picture,which draws me in that one and so on"
Let me clearly say.Iam object 'A' and i am drawing my own picture 'B'.Now what is 'B' doing?he is drawing his picture,that is me,'C'.Now 'C' is drawing 'D',and so and so.

I think you had got it,now let us see where does we started.
That is from the original me(A),so from A,to B,C,D etc etc,we goes on to infinity,right?

That means A -----> infinity.

We started from A and goes to infinity,so we had a starting point,it resembles a RAY which has a single end and an another endless end.We also might know what is a LINE(no ends) and a LINE SEGMENT(2 definite ends).

The peculiarity between them is that,RAY and a LINE SEGMENT is a part of a LINE.So our RAY(A ------>infinity) is a part of infinity------->infinity,which means some creature is drawing original me or am just a picture of some other being,which means am a part of the long told infinity.

So at-last,

My assumption: A ----->infinity
My conclusion: infinity -----> A ----->infinity

A(me) belongs to infinity.

[there is a peculiarity between this infinity----->infinity line,I will describe it later]

Assumptions and Conclusions are really modifiable,so in case,protest immediately.

Is there anything named dimension?

 Is there anything named dimension?

There may be many dimensions.0,1,2,3,4...etc(according to current ideas).What ever it is,let us contradict higher and lower dimensions exists.now it is a true statement,such that it is a truth.Now let us think what might be its use?what was or is or will be its advantage? and why does it doesn't show really and provided a chance for our brains to think?(only true when our concept of dimension is true)

Do the higher dimensions( what we consider) have a high ability to show theory of conservation? or can it include the most complex structure and processes of universe? or is it which controls the uniqueness of elements and conditionally makes their conversion.Or are they highly unstable but productive?

Reasons have no bounds,but you can share your ideas.